AccScience Publishing / JSE / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JSE026280136
Cite this article
2
Download
44
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Natural-source seismic frequency imaging for shallow-strata characterization of power-transmission tower foundations in mountainous terrain

Xinming Yu1* ,  Wangxin Cai1 ,  Congyu Lin1 ,  Xiao Yang2* ,  Jiahui Zuo2
Show Less
1 State Grid Fujian Economic Research Institute, Fuzhou, Fujian , China
2 Geological Survey and Digital Earth (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing , China
Received: 10 July 2026 | Revised: 28 September 2026 | Accepted: 28 September 2026 | Published online: 26 October 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Reliable foundation design for power-transmission towers in mountainous terrain requires accurate knowledge of shallow weathering and bedrock geometry, yet steep relief, irregular bedrock, and uneven weathering limit point-based drilling and conventional surveys at the approximately 22 m × 22 m tower footprint. Here, natural-source seismic frequency imaging was adapted to this setting through a multi-constrained characteristic-frequency workflow, a diagonal-crossing observation system, and terrain-adaptive acquisition. Three survey grids comprising 138 stations were acquired in Minhou, Fujian, using 1 m receiver spacing and 20 min records. The resulting dimensionless normalized relative wave-impedance profiles delineated the silty-clay cover and completely, strongly, and moderately weathered tuff, including a site with 19 m internal relief. Against 13 interfaces from five boreholes, signed depth errors ranged from −0.80 to 1.20 m (root mean square error [RMSE] 0.61 m; mean absolute error [MAE] 0.53 m). Supplementary sensitivity analysis shows that velocity-prior and characteristic-frequency biases can produce depth errors comparable to the field residuals, whereas the chosen 1 m spacing contributes relatively small geometric interpolation error for interfaces varying over wavelengths of several meters. A geometry-only 3D sampling test further shows that the diagonal layout can miss small off-line bodies and therefore cannot replace true 3D investigation. The method is consequently best used as a borehole-calibrated, continuous-coverage complement for shallow foundation characterization rather than as a stand-alone lithology classifier.

Keywords
Power-transmission tower foundation
Complex mountainous terrain
Natural-source seismic frequency imaging
Ambient noise
Multi-constrained characteristic-frequency extraction
Diagonal-crossing observation system
Normalized relative wave impedance
Reliability evaluation
Funding
This research was funded by the Science and Technology Project of State Grid Fujian Electric Power Co., Ltd. (State Grid Fujian Economic Research Institute 2026 Project: Key Technologies and Equipment Development for Fully Localized Detection of Non-Metallic and Deep-Buried Pipelines in Power Grid Engineering; contract number SGFJJY00PWJS2600068).
Conflict of interest
Xiao Yang and Jiahui Zuo are employed by Geological Survey and Digital Earth (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.; however, they were not involved in any activities that could constitute a conflict of interest in relation to this study. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Ibitoye FP, Ipinmoroti FV, Salami M, Akinluwade KJ, Taiwo AT, Adetunji AR. Application of geophysical methods to building foundation studies. Int J Geosci. 2013;4(9):1256-1266. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2013.49120
  2. Zhu HH, Yan JX, Liang WH. Challenges and development prospects of ultra-long and ultra-deep mountain tunnels. Engineering. 2019;5(3):384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.009
  3. Martínez K, Mendoza JA. Urban seismic site investigations for a new metro in central Copenhagen: near-surface imaging using reflection, refraction and VSP methods. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C. 2011;36(16):1228-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.01.003
  4. Lai WWL, Dérobert X, Annan P. A review of ground-penetrating radar application in civil engineering: a 30-year journey from locating and testing to imaging and diagnosis. NDT E Int. 2018;96:58-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.002
  5. Loke MH, Chambers JE, Rucker DF, Kuras O, Wilkinson PB. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. J Appl Geophys. 2013;95:135-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.02.017
  6. Egbert GD. Robust multiple-station magnetotelluric data processing. Geophys J Int. 1997;130(2):475-496. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb05663.x
  7. Weckmann U, Magunia A, Ritter O. Effective noise separation for magnetotelluric single-site data processing using a frequency-domain selection scheme. Geophys J Int. 2005;161(3):635-652. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02621.x
  8. Foti S, Hollender F, Garofalo F, et al. Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis: a product of the InterPACIFIC project. Bull Earthquake Eng. 2018;16(6):2367-2420. doi: 10.1007/s10518-017-0206-7
  9. Socco LV, Foti S, Boiero D. Surface-wave analysis for building near-surface velocity models—established approaches and new perspectives. Geophysics. 2010;75(5):75A83-75A102. doi: 10.1190/1.3479491
  10. Solla M, Pérez-Gracia V, Fontul S. A review of GPR application on transport infrastructures: troubleshooting and best practices. Remote Sens. 2021;13(4):672. doi: 10.3390/rs13040672
  11. Capozzoli L, Rizzo E. Combined NDT techniques in civil engineering applications: laboratory and real test. Constr Build Mater. 2017;154:1139-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.147
  12. Qin H, Xie X, Vrugt JA, Zeng K, Hong G. Underground structure defect detection and reconstruction using crosshole GPR and Bayesian waveform inversion. Autom Constr. 2016;68:156-169. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.011
  13. Romero-Ruiz A, Linde N, Keller T, Or D. A review of geophysical methods for soil structure characterization. Rev Geophys. 2018;56(4):672-697. doi: 10.1029/2018RG000611
  14. Wadas S, Polom U, Krawczyk CM. High-resolution shear-wave seismic reflection as a tool to image near-surface subrosion structures—a case study in Bad Frankenhausen, Germany. Solid Earth. 2016;7(5):1491-1508. doi: 10.5194/se-7-1491-2016
  15. Picozzi M, Parolai S, Bindi D, Strollo A. Characterization of shallow geology by high-frequency seismic noise tomography. Geophys J Int. 2009;176(1):164-174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03966.x
  16. Malehmir A, Durrheim R, Bellefleur G, et al. Seismic methods in mineral exploration and mine planning: a general overview of past and present case histories and a look into the future. Geophysics. 2012;77(5):WC173-WC190. doi: 10.1190/geo2012-0028.1
  17. Lin FC, Li D, Clayton RW, Hollis D. High-resolution 3D shallow crustal structure in Long Beach, California: application of ambient noise tomography on a dense seismic array. Geophysics. 2013;78(4):Q45-Q56. doi: 10.1190/GEO2012-0453.1
  18. Pazzi V, Di Filippo M, Di Nezza M, et al. Integrated geophysical survey in a sinkhole-prone area: microgravity, electrical resistivity tomographies, and seismic noise measurements to delimit its extension. Eng Geol. 2018;243:282-293. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.07.016
  19. Lermo J, Chávez-García FJ. Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 1993;83(5):1574-1594. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0830051574
  20. Molnar S, Cassidy JF, Castellaro S, et al. Application of microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio analysis for site characterization: state of the art. Surv Geophys. 2018;39(4):613-631. doi: 10.1007/s10712-018-9464-4
  21. Xu R, Wang L. The horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio and its applications. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2021;2021:75. doi: 10.1186/s13634-021-00765-z
  22. Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics. 1999;64(3):800-808. doi: 10.1190/1.1444590
  23. Xia J, Miller RD, Park CB. Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics. 1999;64(3):691-700. doi: 10.1190/1.1444578
  24. Asten MW, Henstridge JD. Array estimators and the use of microseisms for reconnaissance of sedimentary basins. Geophysics. 1984;49(11):1828-1837. doi: 10.1190/1.1441596
  25. Molnar S, Sirohey A, Assaf J, et al. A review of the microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio method. J Seismol. 2022;26(4):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10950-021-10062-9
  26. Sgattoni G, Castellaro S. Detecting 1-D and 2-D ground resonances with a single-station approach. Geophys J Int. 2020;223(1):471-487. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggaa325
  27. Bonnefoy-Claudet S, Cotton F, Bard PY. The nature of noise wavefield and its applications for site effects studies: a literature review. Earth Sci Rev. 2006;79(3-4):205-227. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.07.004
  28. Campillo M, Paul A. Long-range correlations in the diffuse seismic coda. Science. 2003;299(5606):547-549. doi: 10.1126/science.1078551
  29. Shapiro NM, Campillo M, Stehly L, Ritzwoller MH. High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise. Science. 2005;307(5715):1615-1618. doi: 10.1126/science.1108339
  30. Socco LV, Strobbia C. Surface-wave method for near-surface characterization: a tutorial. Near Surf Geophys. 2004;2(4):165-185. doi: 10.3997/1873-0604.2004015
  31. Foti S, Lai CG, Rix GJ, Strobbia C. Surface Wave Methods for Near-Surface Site Characterization. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2014. doi: 10.1201/b17268
  32. Bignardi S. The uncertainty of estimating the thickness of soft sediments with the HVSR method: a computational point of view on weak lateral variations. J Appl Geophys. 2017;145:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.07.017
  33. Moon SW, Subramaniam P, Zhang Y, Vinoth G, Ku T. Bedrock depth evaluation using microtremor measurement: empirical guidelines at weathered granite formation in Singapore. J Appl Geophys. 2019;171:103866. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103866
  34. Baglari D, Dey A, Taipodia J. A state-of-the-art review of passive MASW survey for subsurface profiling. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2018;3:66. doi: 10.1007/s41062-018-0171-2
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing