AccScience Publishing / JSE / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JSE026220092
Cite this article
16
Download
258
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Deblending of marine simultaneous source seismic data via nonsubsampled contourlet transform and twin support vector machine

Kun Zou1 Jianhua Wang2* Shuaibing Li3 Yu Zhong1 Yong Liu1 Yanan Zhang1 Yandong Wang2 Hanming Gu4
Show Less
1 School of Artificial Intelligence, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan, Hubei , China
2 CNOOC Research Institute Ltd., and the National Engineering Research Center of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration, Beijing , China
3 School of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, Sichuan University of Arts and Science, Dazhou, Sichuan , China
4 School of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei , China
Received: 12 May 2026 | Revised: 15 July 2026 | Accepted: 24 July 2026 | Published online: 3 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

In marine simultaneous source acquisition, although acquisition efficiency has significantly improved, the nearly concurrent firing of multiple sources introduces strong interference among source wavefields in the recorded data, which must be deblended before further processing. In this study, we adopt an iterative shrinkage thresholding deblending framework in a sparse transform domain. For such methods, designing an appropriate thresholding strategy to handle transform domain coefficients effectively is critical. To this end, the nonsubsampled contourlet transform (NSCT), which provides a multiscale, multidirectional, and shift-invariant representation, is employed. A refined shrinkage thresholding strategy tailored to the NSCT domain coefficients of blended seismic data is proposed. First, the blended data are decomposed into subbands at different scales and directions using the NSCT. Subsequently, an adaptive threshold estimation scheme is developed to accommodate the different distributions of useful signal and blending noise across scales and directions. However, coefficient heterogeneity exists not only across NSCT scales and directions but also within each directional subband. Therefore, after constructing scale- and direction-adaptive baseline thresholds, a twin support vector machine classifier is introduced to distinguish useful-signal-dominant coefficients from blending-noise-dominant coefficients, enabling class-dependent threshold refinement. Finally, shrinkage is applied to the NSCT coefficients using the refined coefficient-wise thresholds. Tests on synthetic and field datasets verify the effectiveness of the proposed method in separation.

Keywords
Marine simultaneous source
Deblending
Adaptive threshold
Nonsubsampled contourlet transform
Twin support vector machine
Funding
This research was funded in part by the Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant 2024AFB511, 2024AFB1043, 2023AFB891, and 2025AFB416); in part by the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant U23B20158); in part by the Open Fund of National Engineering Research Center of Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration (Grant CCL2024RCPS0291KQN); and in part by the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Hubei University of Automotive Technology (Grant BK202334).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Berkhout AG. Changing the mindset in seismic data acquisition. Leading Edge. 2008;27(7):924-938. doi: 10.1190/1.2954035
  2. Hampson G, Stefani J, Herkenhoff F. Acquisition using simultaneous sources. Leading Edge. 2008;27(7):918-923. doi: 10.1190/1.2954034
  3. Beasley CJ. A new look at marine simultaneous sources. Leading Edge. 2008;27(7):914-917. doi: 10.1190/1.2954033
  4. Zhang S, Song J. Deblending by sparse inversion and its applications to high-productivity seismic acquisition: Case studies. Pet Sci. 2025;22(4):1548-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.petsci.2025.03.019
  5. Cheng J, Chen W, Zhou L, Yang L, Liu Q, Zhang X. Deblending of simultaneous-source seismic data using Bregman iterative shaping. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2021;59(7):6208-6217. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3020468
  6. Wei Y, Cao J, Huang X, Chen X, Cai Z. Adaptive iterative deblending of simultaneous-source seismic data based on sparse inversion. Acta Geophys. 2021;69(2):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s11600-021-00561-1
  7. Mahdad A, Doulgeris P, Blacquiere G. Separation of blended data by iterative estimation and subtraction of blending interference noise. Geophysics. 2011;76(3):9-17. doi: 10.1190/1.3556597
  8. Huo S, Luo Y, Kelamis PG. Simultaneous sources separation via multidirectional vector-median filtering. Geophysics. 2012;77(4):123-131. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0254.1
  9. Chen Y, Yuan J, Jin Z, Chen K, Zhang L. Deblending using normal moveout and median filtering in common-midpoint gathers. J Geophys Eng. 2014;11(4). doi: 10.1088/1742-2132/11/4/045012
  10. Huang G, Bai M, Zhao Q, Chen W, Chen Y. Erratic noise suppression using iterative structure‐oriented space‐varying median filtering with sparsity constraint. Geophys Prospect. 2021;69(1):101-121. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.13032
  11. Duan Z, Wang H, Wang Y. Simultaneous source separation and noise reduction with structure-oriented space-varying alpha-trimmed mean filter. J Appl Geophys. 2024;220:105253. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2023.105253
  12. Mahdad A, Doulgeris P, Blacquière G. Iterative method for the separation of blended seismic data: Discussion on the algorithmic aspects. Geophys Prospect. 2012;60(4):782-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01084.x
  13. Abma R, Howe D, Foster M, et al. Independent simultaneous source acquisition and processing. Geophysics. 2015;80(6):37-44. doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0078.1
  14. Jeong W, Tsingas C, Almubarak MS, Ma Y. Compressive sensing principles applied in time and space for three‐dimensional land seismic data acquisition and processing. Geophys Prospect. 2025;73(1):3-18. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.13654
  15. Liu W, Zu S, Li Z, Liang M, Chen X. Iterative deblending based on two-dimensional fast Fourier transform with multistage median bilateral filtering. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2025;63:1-10. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3572828
  16. Mansour H, Wason H, Lin TTY, Herrmann FJ. Randomized marine acquisition with compressive sampling matrices. Geophys Prospect. 2012;60(4):648-662. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01075.x
  17. Zu S, Zhou H, Mao W, Gong F, Huang W. 3D deblending of simultaneous source data based on 3D multi-scale shaping operator. J Appl Geophys. 2018;151:274-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.02.014
  18. Ibrahim A, Sacchi MD. Simultaneous source separation using a robust Radon transform. Geophysics. 2014;79(1):1-11. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0168.1
  19. Xue Y, Man M, Zu S, Chang F, Chen Y. Amplitude-preserving iterative deblending of simultaneous source seismic data using high-order radon transform. J Appl Geophys. 2017;139:79-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.02.010
  20. Wang B, Wang J, Li J, Guo Z. Iterative accurate seismic data deblending by ASB-based robust sparse radon transform. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2022;60:1-9. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3068795
  21. Chen Y, Fomel S, Hu J. Iterative deblending of simultaneous-source seismic data using seislet-domain shaping regularization. Geophysics. 2014;79(5):179-189. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0449.1
  22. Zou K, Wang J, Gu H. Seismic data deblending by block matching and sparse 3-D transform. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2023;20:1-5. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2023.3302385
  23. Zou K, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. An effective workflow for deblending simultaneous source marine data using the seislet transform. Acta Geophys. 2026;74(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s11600-025-01734-y
  24. Cao J, Verschuur E, Gu H, Li L. Joint deblending and data reconstruction with focal transformation. Geophysics. 2019;84(3):219-231. doi: 10.1190/geo2018-0626.1
  25. Kontakis A, Verschuur DJ. Focal deblending: Marine data processing experiences. Geophys Prospect. 2024;72(2):333-352. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.13404
  26. Sun J, Slang S, Elboth T, Larsen Greiner T, McDonald S, Gelius L-J. A convolutional neural network approach to deblending seismic data. Geophysics. 2020;85(4):WA13-WA26. doi: 10.1190/geo2019-0173.1
  27. Zu S, Cao J, Qu S, Chen Y. Iterative deblending for simultaneous source data using the deep neural network. Geophysics. 2020;85(2):V131-V141. doi: 10.1190/geo2019-0319.1
  28. Wang B, Li J, Luo J, Wang Y, Geng J. Intelligent deblending of seismic data based on U-Net and transfer learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2021;59(10):8885-8894. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3048746
  29. Wei Y, Zhu Y, Cao J, Han L, Yang Q, Liu Q. Jī yú U-Net++ de duō chèndì céng xūnyuán shùjù jiěméng yánjiū [Research on simultaneous-source data deblending based on U-Net++]. Chin J Geophys. 2025;68(6):2375-2389. [In Chinese] doi: 10.6038/cjg2024S0368
  30. Xu W, Liu D, Wang X, Sacchi MD, Chen W. Implicit neural representations for self-supervised seismic deblending. Geophysics. 2025;90(6):V615-V632. doi: 10.1190/geo2024-0620.1
  31. Lin S, Mo T, Wang B. Intelligent Deblending via an Automatic Multistage Training Framework. Geophys Prospect. 2026;74(5). doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.70196
  32. Da Cunha AL, Zhou J, Do MN. The nonsubsampled contourlet transform: theory, design, and applications. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006;15(10):3089-3101. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2006.877507
  33. Chang SG, Yu B, Vetterli M. Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2000;9(9):1532-1546. doi: 10.1109/83.862633
  34. Wang X, Yang H, Zhang Y, Fu Z. Image denoising using SVM classification in nonsubsampled contourlet transform domain. Inf Sci. 2013;246:155-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.05.028
  35. Deng H, Zhang W, Mortensen E, Dietterich T, Shapiro L. Principal curvature-based region detector for object recognition. In: 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2007:1-8. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2007.382972
  36. Kovesi P. Image features from phase congruency. Videre. 1999;1(3):1-26.
  37. Chen Y, Zhao L, Pan J, et al. Deep carbonate reservoir characterisation using multi-seismic attributes via machine learning with physical constraints. J Geophys Eng. 2021;18(5):761-775. doi: 10.1093/jge/gxab049
  38. Gao BB, Wang JJ. A Fast and robust TSVM for pattern classification. arXiv. Preprint posted online 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1711.05406
  39. Suh M. An Integrated Geophysical Study of the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Deep Seismic Reflection Profiling, Seismic Stratigraphy, Gravity Modeling, and Crustal Structure. PhD Dissertation. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University; 1989. doi: 10.31390/gradschool_disstheses.4880
  40. Mutter J, Mutter C, Abers G, Lister G, Diebold J. Raw multi-channel seismic shot data from the Woodlark Basin acquired during R/V Maurice Ewing expedition EW9203 (1992). Marine Geoscience Data System. 2014. doi: 10.1594/IEDA/300379
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing