An efficient and accurate time-domain acoustic wave modeling using asymmetric factorization of implicit finite-difference operators
Implicit finite-difference (FD) methods are widely used in seismic wave modeling for their accuracy and coarse-sampling advantages, yet balancing temporal accuracy and computational cost remains a challenge. Conventional implicit schemes achieve high spatial accuracy but remain second-order in time, requiring fine time steps to mitigate temporal dispersion. Recently developed spatiotemporal high-order implicit methods improve temporal accuracy but introduce substantial computational overhead due to the inclusion of numerous additional grid points. To address this limitation, we propose an asymmetric factorization of implicit FD operators for time-domain acoustic wave modeling. This novel approach derives FD coefficients through a joint approximation of temporal and spatial derivatives by matching the discrete wave equation’s dispersion relation, rather than approximating spatial derivatives alone. Combined with a variable-substitution-based Taylor-series expansion, our method achieved (2M+2)th-order spatial accuracy and (2N)th-order temporal accuracy while requiring only half as many additional grid points as conventional spatiotemporal implicit schemes (per spatial operator in the 2D case). Dispersion analysis demonstrated that the proposed scheme effectively suppressed numerical dispersion across a wide range of wavenumbers and Courant numbers. Stability analysis revealed that our method permitted larger time steps than conventional implicit schemes. Numerical experiments in both homogeneous and heterogeneous media validated the method’s superior accuracy and computational efficiency. The proposed asymmetric factorization offers a practical solution for seismic imaging and full-waveform inversion applications in 2D and 3D subsurface settings where both accuracy and efficiency are critical.
- Robertsson JO, Blanch JO, Symes WW. Viscoelastic Finite-Difference Modeling. Geophysics. 1994;59(9):1444-1456. doi: 10.1190/1.1443701
- Carcione JM, Herman GC, Kroode APE. Seismic Modeling. Geophysics. 2002;67(4):1304-1325. doi: 10.1190/1.1500393
- Moczo P, Kristek J, Gális M. The Finite-Difference of Earthquake Motions: Waves and Ruptures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2014. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139236911
- Fang G, Fomel S, Du Q, Hu J. Lowrank Seismic-Wave Extrapolation on a Staggered Grid. Geophysics. 2014;79(3):T157-T168. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0290.1
- Koene EFM, Robertsson JOA. Optimal Finite-Difference Operators for Arbitrarily Sampled Data. Geophysics. 2020;85(3):F39-F51. doi: 10.1190/geo2019-0081.1
- Yee K. Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary Value Problems Involving Maxwell's Equations in Isotropic Media. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 1966;14(3):302-307. doi: 10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693
- Virieux J. SH-Wave Propagation in Heterogeneous Media: Velocity‐stress Finite‐difference Method. Geophysics. 1984;49(11):1933-1942. doi: 10.1190/1.1441605
- Virieux J. P-SV Wave Propagation in Heterogeneous Media: Velocity‐stress Finite‐difference Method. Geophysics. 1986;51(4):889-901. doi: 10.1190/1.1442147
- Graves RW. Simulating Seismic Wave Propagation in 3D Elastic Media Using Staggered-Grid Finite Differences. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 1996;86(4):1091-1106. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0860041091
- Dablain MA. The Application of High‐order Differencing to the Scalar Wave Equation. Geophysics. 1986;51(1):54-66. doi: 10.1190/1.1442040
- Kindelan M, Kamel A, Sguazzero P. On the Construction and Efficiency of Staggered Numerical Differentiators for the Wave Equation. Geophysics. 1990;55(1):107-110. doi: 10.1190/1.1442763
- Liu Y, Sen MK. Numerical Modeling of Wave Equation by a Truncated High-Order Finite-Difference Method. Earthq Sci. 2009;22:205-213. doi: 10.1007/s11589-009-0205-0
- Kosloff D, Pestana RC, Tal-Ezer H. Acoustic and Elastic Numerical Wave Simulations by Recursive Spatial Derivative Operators. Geophysics. 2010;75(6):T167-T174. doi: 10.1190/1.3485217
- Lele SK. Compact Finite Difference Schemes with Spectral-like Resolution. J Comput Phys. 1992;103(1):16-42. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90324-R
- Liu Y, Sen MK. An Implicit Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Method for Seismic Modelling. Geophys J Int. 2009;179(1):459-474. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04305.x
- Chu C, Stoffa PL. An Implicit Finite-Difference Operator for the Helmholtz Equation. Geophysics. 2012;77(4):T97-T107. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0314.1
- Yang L, Yan H, Liu H. An Optimal Implicit Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Scheme Based on the Modified Taylor-Series Expansion with Minimax Approximation Method for Elastic Modeling. J Appl Geophys. 2017;138:161-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.01.020
- Wang E, Liu Y. An Implicit Spatial and High-Order Temporal Finite Difference Scheme for 2D Acoustic Modelling. Explor Geophys. 2018;49(2):187-201. doi: 10.1071/EG16094
- Wang J, Liu Y, Zhou H. High Temporal Accuracy Elastic Wave Simulation with New Time–Space Domain Implicit Staggered‐grid Finite‐difference Schemes. Geophys Prospect. 2022;70(8):1346-1366. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.13244
- Chen J. Lax‐Wendroff and Nyström Methods for Seismic Modelling. Geophys Prospect. 2009;57(6):931-941. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00802.x
- Chen J. A Stability Formula for Lax-Wendroff Methods with Fourth-Order in Time and General-Order in Space for the Scalar Wave Equation. Geophysics. 2011;76(2):T37-T42. doi: 10.1190/1.3554626
- Long G, Zhao Y, Zou JA. Temporal Fourth-Order Scheme for the First-Order Acoustic Wave Equations. Geophys J Int. 2013;194(3):1473-1485. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt168
- Tal-Ezer H, Kosloff D, Koren Z. An accurate scheme for seismic forward modelling. Geophys Prospect. 1987;35(5):479-490. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1987.tb00830.x
- Kosloff D, Queiroz Filho A, Tessmer E, et al. Numerical solution of the acoustic and elastic wave equations by a new rapid expansion method. Geophys Prospect. 1989;37(4):383-394. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1989.tb02212.x
- Pestana RC, Stoffa PL. Time evolution of the wave equation using rapid expansion method. Geophysics. 2010;75(4):T121-T131. doi: 10.1190/1.3449091
- Tessmer E. Using the rapid expansion method for accurate time-stepping in modeling and reverse-time migration. Geophysics. 2011;76(4):S177-S185. doi: 10.1190/1.3587217
- Zhang Q, Wang D, Zhou J. Acoustic wave equation numerical simulation for pure P-wave in 2D TTI medium. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2015;54(5):485-492. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.05.001
- Chen H. Numerical Simulation and Reverse-Time Migration Method Research base on Acoustic Wave Equation [master's thesis]. Changchun, China: Jilin University; 2010. [In Chinese]
- Finkelstein B, Kastner R. Finite Difference Time Domain Dispersion Reduction Schemes. J Comput Phys. 2007;221(1):422-438. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.06.016
- Finkelstein B, Kastner R. A Comprehensive New Methodology for Formulating FDTD Schemes with Controlled Order of Accuracy and Dispersion. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2008;56(11):3516-3525. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2008.2005458
- Liu Y, Sen MK. Scalar Wave Equation Modeling with Time-Space Domain Dispersion-Relation-Based Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Schemes. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 2011;101(1):141-159. doi: 10.1785/0120100041
- Liu Y, Sen MK. Time–Space Domain Dispersion-Relation-Based Finite-Difference Method with Arbitrary Even-Order Accuracy for the 2D Acoustic Wave Equation. J Comput Phys. 2013;232(1):327-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.025
- Tan S, Huang L. An Efficient Finite-Difference Method with High-Order Accuracy in Both Time and Space Domains for Modelling Scalar-Wave Propagation. Geophys J Int. 2014;197(2):1250-1267. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu077
- Chen H, Zhou H, Sheng S. General Rectangular Grid Based Time-Space Domain High-Order Finite-Difference Methods for Modeling Scalar Wave Propagation. J Appl Geophys. 2016;133:141-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.07.021
- Wang E, Liu Y, Sen MK. Effective Finite-Difference Modelling Methods with 2-D Acoustic Wave Equation Using a Combination of Cross and Rhombus Stencils. Geophys J Int. 2016;206(3):1933-1958. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggw250
- Ren Z, Li ZC. Temporal High-Order Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Schemes for Elastic Wave Propagation. Geophysics. 2017;82(5):T207-T224. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0005.1
- Wang J, Liu Y, Zhou H. A New Linear Optimized Time–Space Domain Spatial Implicit and Temporal High-Order Finite-Difference Scheme for Scalar Wave Modeling. J Appl Geophys. 2022;201:104637. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2022.104637
- Ren Z, Li Z. High-Order Temporal and Implicit Spatial Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Operators for Modelling Seismic Wave Propagation. Geophys J Int. 2019;217(2):844-865. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggz059
- Wang J, Liu Y, Zhou H. Acoustic Wave Propagation with New Spatial Implicit and Temporal High-Order Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Schemes. J Geophys Eng. 2021;18(5):808-823. doi: 10.1093/jge/gxab053
- Wang E, Ba J, Liu Y. Time-Space-Domain Implicit Finite-Difference Methods for Modeling Acoustic Wave Equations. Geophysics. 2018;83(4):T175-T193. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0546.1
- Wang J, Liu Y, Zhou H. Temporal and spatial high-order accuracy implicit finite-difference method for modeling acoustic wave equation on rectangular staggered-grid. Chin J Geophys. 2023;66(1):368-382. [In Chinese] doi: 10.6038/cjg2022P0778
- Zhou H, Liu Y, Wang J, Ma Y. Novel First-Order k-Space Formulations for Wave Propagation by Asymmetrical Factorization of Space-Wavenumber Domain Wave Propagators. Geophysics. 2022;87(6):T417-T433. doi: 10.1190/geo2021-0582.1
- Zhou H, Chen H, Liu Y, Zhang L. A new framework for k-space wave propagation by asymmetrical factorization of wavenumber-time domain wave propagators. In: 84th EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition. Houten, Netherlands: European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers; 2023;2023(1):1-5. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.202310947
- Zhou H, Liu Y, Wang J. Elastic Wave Modeling with High-Order Temporal and Spatial Accuracies by a Selectively Modified and Linearly Optimized Staggered-Grid Finite-Difference Scheme. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2022;60:3000122. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3078626
- Zhou H, Wang J, Liu Y. Removing the discretization errors for the fractional spatial derivatives based constant-Q viscoelastic wave equation modeling. In: Second International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum Geologists; 2022:2537-2541. doi: 10.1190/image2022-3751576.1
