AccScience Publishing / JSE / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JSE026210088
Cite this article
1
Download
30
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Geological survey and rock-physics seismic interpretation of an ultra-shallow gas reservoir in the deep-water Qiongdongnan Basin, China

Jianxiang Pei1 ,  Wanyuan Sun1* ,  Fang Li1 ,  Yanhua Xie1 ,  Chongyan Wu1 ,  Jinpeng Li1
Show Less
1 Research Institute, CNOOC Hainan Branch, Haikou, Hainan , China
Received: 19 May 2026 | Revised: 8 September 2026 | Accepted: 8 September 2026 | Published online: 5 November 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Ultra-shallow gas and hydrate-bearing systems in deep-water Quaternary strata are important exploration targets, but their geological controls and seismic responses remain difficult to quantify because the reservoirs are weakly consolidated, laterally heterogeneous, and commonly occur near the base of the gas-hydrate stability zone. This study presents an integrated geological and rock-physics seismic interpretation of the Lingshui 36-1 (LS36-1) ultra-shallow gas reservoir in the Qiongdongnan Basin. Regional geology, seismic interpretation, gas-source geochemistry, drilled sediment samples, and rock-physics modeling were combined into a case-specific interpretation workflow. The results indicate that shallow gas enrichment is controlled by the coupling of a Quaternary submarine-fan sand body, a fault-gas chimney-microfracture migration system, and three sealing elements: deep-water mud, mass-transport deposits, and hydrate-bearing intervals. The gas is methane-dominated dry gas related to mature to over-mature coal-measure source rocks of the Paleogene Yacheng Formation. Samples showed that the reservoirs are very weakly consolidated and highly porous; Ledong submarine-fan sandstone had porosities of 38.4%–42.5% and permeabilities of 48.4–598.4 mD, whereas a broader shallow-reservoir sample set showed porosities of 28.4%–43.6%. Laboratory velocity measurements were interpreted as trend-calibration data rather than pressure-equivalent reservoir velocities. In free-gas-bearing samples, replacing gas with water increased P- and S-wave velocities; in hydrate-bearing samples, decreasing water saturation increased hydrate saturation and therefore increased stiffness. A Hertz–Mindlin–Hashin–Shtrikman–Gassmann workflow, constrained by well logs and calibrated mineral/fluid parameters, predicted high P-wave impedance at the top of hydrate-bearing intervals and low P-wave impedance at the top of free-gas intervals. We therefore used P-wave impedance to identify sand-prone reservoirs, while the P-wave velocity ratio ranked high gas-saturation intervals. The inversion is consistent with LS36-1 well data but lacks independent blind-well validation because no additional verification well is available. The workflow provides a case-specific, uncertainty-aware approach for evaluating deep-water ultra-shallow gas and hydrate-associated reservoirs.

Keywords
Quaternary seabed
Ultra-shallow gas reservoir
Lingshui 36-1
Qiongdongnan Basin
Gas-hydrate stability
Rock physics
Seismic inversion
Funding
The study was funded by the Science and Technology Special Fund of Hainan Province (ZDYF2024GXJS031).
Conflict of interest
All authors are employees of CNOOC Hainan Branch; however, they were not involved in any activities that could constitute a conflict of interest in relation to this study.
References
  1. Waite WF, Santamarina JC, Cortes DD, et al. Physical properties of hydrate‐bearing sediments. Rev Geophys. 2009;47(4):RG4003. doi: 10.1029/2008rg000279
  2. Sloan ED Jr, Koh CA. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007. doi: 10.1201/9781420008494
  3. Collett TS. Natural Gas Hydrates of the Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk River Area, North Slope, Alaska. AAPG Bull. 1993;77(5):793-812. doi: 10.1306/bdff8d62-1718-11d7-8645000102c1865d
  4. Kvenvolden KA. Gas hydrates—geological perspective and global change. Rev Geophys. 1993;31(2):173-187. doi: 10.1029/93rg00268
  5. Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G. Quantitative seismic interpretation: Applying rock physics tools to reduce interpretation risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511600074
  6. Shi HS, Yang JH, Zhang YZ, Gan J, Yang JH. Shi HS, Yang JH, Zhang YZ, Gan J, Yang JH. Qiongdongnan Pendi Dizhi Renshi Chuangxin yu Shenshui Lingyu Tianranqi Kantan Zhongda Tupo [Geological understanding innovation and major breakthrough in natural gas exploration in deep-water in Qiongdongnan Basin]. China Pet Explor. 2019;24(6):691-698. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.06.001
  7. Huang H, Huang B, Huang Y, Li X, Tian H. Condensate origin and hydrocarbon accumulation mechanism of the deepwater giant gas field in western South China Sea: A case study of Lingshui 17-2 gas field in Qiongdongnan Basin. Pet Explor Dev. 2017;44(3):409-417. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30047-2
  8. Yu GM, Gu CW, Song Y, et al. Shenshui Qiancengqi Zuanjing Fengxian Pinggu yu Kongzhi Jishu [Risk assessment and control technology for deep-water shallow-gas drilling]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology. 2022;44(3):297-301. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2022.03.005
  9. Li P, Du J, Liu LJ, Cao CX, Xu YQ. Woguo Jinhai Haidi Qiancengqi Fenbu Tezheng [Distribution characteristics of the shallow gas in Chinese offshore seabed]. Chin J Geol Hazard Control. 2010;21(1):69-74. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8035.2010.01.015
  10. Gao Y, Jin Q, Zhu G. Genetic types and distribution of shallow-buried natural gases. Pet Sci. 2010;7(3):347-354. doi: 10.1007/s12182-010-0076-y
  11. Li SK, Wen XT, Ruan YQ, Li T, Zhang R, Zhang JM. Jiyu White Moxing de Hanqi Shayyan Chuizhi Rushe Dizhen Xiangying Tezheng Fenxi [Analysis of seismic response characteristics from vertical incident in sandstone gas reservoir based on the White model]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum. 2017;56(2):232-239. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2017.02.010
  12. Deng JX, Han DH, Wang S. Yingli Songsong dui Keli Wuzhi Tanxing Xingzhi de Yingxiang ji Dengxiao Jiezhi Moxing Jiaozheng Yanjiu [A study of the influence of stress relaxation on the elastic properties of granular materials and the calibration of effective media model]. Chin J Geophys. 2011;54(4):1079-1089. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.04.023
  13. Chong ZR, Yang SHB, Babu P, Linga P, Li XS. Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: Prospects and challenges. Appl Energ. 2016;162:1633-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.061
  14. Zhang W, Liang J, Su P, et al. Distribution and characteristics of mud diapirs, gas chimneys, and bottom simulating reflectors associated with hydrocarbon migration and gas hydrate accumulation in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern slope of the South China Sea. Geol J. 2018;54(6):3556-3573. doi: 10.1002/gj.3351
  15. Liu T, Bao X, Zhu X, Li A. Han Tianranqi Shuihewu Chuceng Shuaijian Yanshi Wuli Yanjiu Jinzhan [Review of rock-physics studies on natural gas hydrate-bearing sediment attenuation]. Rev Geophys and Planetary Physics. 2024;55(3):369-380. [In Chinese] doi: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2023-028
  16. Yuan H, Han Dh, Wang Y. A review of rock physical models for elastic properties characterization of gas hydrate bearing sediments. J Pet Sci Eng. 2022;218:111013. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111013
  17. Wang XJ, Han L, Liu JZ, Jin JP, Kuang ZG, Zhou JL. Tianranqi Shuihewu yu Youliqi Gongcun de Diqiu Wuli Tezheng yu Shibie [Geophysical characteristics and identification of the coexistence of gas hydrate and free gas]. Earth Sci Front. 2025;32(2):20-35. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.11.22
  18. Jia PW, Lu Y, Su PB, et al. Shenhu Haiyu Tianranqi Shuihewu Cejing-Dizhen Xiangying Tezheng [Logging and seismic response characteristics of natural gas hydrate in the Shenhu area]. Acta Geologica Sinica. 2024;98(9):2654-2665. [In Chinese] doi: 10.19762/j.cnki.dizhixuebao.2024312
  19. Lai H F, Qiu H J, Liang J Q, et al. Geochemical Characteristics and Gas-to-Gas Correlation of Two Leakage-type Gas Hydrate Accumulations in the Western Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea. Acta Geologica Sinica (Eng). 2022;96(2):680-690. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.14931
  20. Zhan L, Liu B, Zhang Y, Lu H. Rock Physics Modeling of Acoustic Properties in Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediment. J Mar Sci Eng. 2022;10(8):1076. doi: 10.3390/jmse10081076
  21. Ghosh R, Ojha M, Kumar P. Review of rock physics theories for quantifying gas hydrate and associated uncertainties. J Asian Earth Sci. 2023;256:105828. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2023.105828
  22. Wang X, Zhou J, Li S, et al. Constraints on Characteristics and Distribution of Gas Hydrate and Free Gas Using Broad-Band Processing of Three-Dimensional Seismic Data. J Ocean Univ China. 2024;23(5):1233-1247. doi: 10.1007/s11802-024-5980-7
  23. Wang X, Collett TS, Lee MW, Yang S, Guo Y, Wu S. Geological controls on the occurrence of gas hydrate from core, downhole log, and seismic data in the Shenhu area, South China Sea. Mar Geol. 2014;357:272-292. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2014.09.040
  24. Wu S, Zhang G, Huang Y, Liang J, Wong HK. Gas hydrate occurrence on the continental slope of the northern South China Sea. Mar Pet Geol. 2005;22(3):403-412. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2004.11.006
  25. Chen LT, Pei JX, Xu FH, et al. Qiongdongnan Pendi Lingshui 36-A Qu Chaoqianceng Tianranqi Guanjian Chengcang Tiaojian yu Chengcang Moshi [Key accumulation conditions and accumulation model of ultra-shallow gas in the Lingshui 36-A area, Qiongdongnan Basin]. Pet Geol Exp. 2026;48(2):418-432. [In Chinese] doi: 10.11781/sysydz2026020418
  26. Huang SZ, Li F, Song P, Hu B, Sun WY. Qiongdongnan Pendi Chaoshenshui Qianbu Qicang Diqiu Wuli Shibie Jishu [Geophysical identification technology for ultra-deep water shallow gas reservoirs in the Qiongdongnan Basin]. Earth Sci. 2024;49(1):313-323. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.339
  27. Zhang GC, Ji M, Chen Y, Gan J, Wang DD, Zhang CY. Qiongdongnan Pendi “Qi Juji Dai” de Chengcang Tezheng yu Kantan Qianli [Accumulation characteristics and exploration potential of the “gas accumulation belt” in the Qiongdongnan Basin]. Acta Petrolei Sinica. 2024;45(1):226-240. [In Chinese] doi: 10.7623/syxb202401013
  28. Wang Z. Fundamentals of seismic rock physics. Geophysics. 2001;66(2):398-412. doi: 10.1190/1.1444931
  29. Ren JF, Chen YH, Xu MJ, et al. Nanhai Beibu Qiongdongnan Pendi Shazhi Tianranqi Shuihewu Chuceng Chenji Tezheng ji Chengcang Moshi [Sedimentary characteristics and accumulation model of sandy gas hydrate reservoirs in the Qiongdongnan Basin, northern South China Sea]. Earth Sci Front. 2025;32(2):94-112. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2024.6.52
  30. Xu C, Wu K, Pei J, Hu L. Enrichment mechanisms and accumulation model of ultra-deep water and ultra-shallow gas: A case study of Lingshui 36-1 gas field in Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea. Pet Explor Dev. 2025;52(1):50-63. doi: 10.1016/s1876-3804(25)60004-8
  31. Chen ZG, Jiang T, Kuang ZG, Cheng C, Xiong PF, Chen Y. Qiongdongnan Pendi Tianranqi Shuihewu yu Qiancengqi Gongsheng Tixi Chengcang Tezheng [Accumulation characteristics of the coexistence system of gas hydrate and shallow gas in the Qiongdongnan Basin]. Earth Science. 2022;47(5):1619-1634. [In Chinese] doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.094
  32. Mukherjee B, Sain K, Ghosh R, Konar S. Translation of machine learning approaches into gas hydrate saturation proxy: a case study from Krishna-Godavari (KG) offshore basin. Mar Geophys Res. 2024;45(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11001-024-09546-3
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing