Seismic elastic inversion based on multi-frequency-band parallel TransUNet and transfer learning with SHAP analysis
In pre-stack seismic inversion, accurate prediction of elastic parameters, such as P- and S-wave velocities, is crucial for reservoir characterization, including fluid identification and lithology discrimination. In recent years, deep learning-based reservoir parameter prediction has been widely applied. However, deep neural networks are usually regarded as black boxes with limited physical interpretability, and it remains challenging to characterize the mapping relationship between seismic data and rock elasticity. In addition, the lack of S-wave velocity (Vs) samples in field well-logging data limits the training accuracy and reliability of deep learning models. To address these problems, we propose a multi-frequency-band parallel Transformer U-Net (TransUNet) inversion framework with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. First, SHAP analysis is introduced to clarify the effects of seismic data across different frequency bands on rock elastic parameters, indicating the necessity of frequency decomposition for multi-parameter prediction. Then, a multi-frequency-band parallel TransUNet architecture is developed, in which simultaneous multi-trace input is used to account for lateral continuity in inversion, and the global receptive field of the Transformer is incorporated to further improve inversion resolution and accuracy. Finally, to handle the shortage of S-wave velocity samples, a stepwise transfer learning strategy is adopted. A large number of P-wave velocity and density samples are first used to optimize the parameters of the backbone network. Subsequently, with the backbone network frozen, a small number of S-wave velocity samples are used to fine-tune the output module, thereby enabling effective seismic S-wave velocity inversion. This study investigates the mapping relationship between frequency-decomposed seismic data and multiple reservoir elastic parameters and provides a deep learning-based inversion strategy for reservoir elastic parameters under limited S-wave velocity data. The proposed method can contribute to the detailed characterization of complex reservoirs.
- Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G. Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2005. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511600074
- Shuey RT. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics. 1985;50(4):609-614. doi: 10.1190/1.1441936
- Russell BH, Hedlin K, Hilterman FJ, Lines LR. Fluid-property discrimination with AVO: a Biot-Gassmann perspective. Geophysics. 2003;68(1):29-39. doi: 10.1190/1.1543192
- Zong Z, Yin X, Wu G. Geofluid discrimination incorporating poroelasticity and seismic reflection inversion. Surv Geophys. 2015;36(5):659-681. doi: 10.1007/s10712-015-9330-6
- Fatti JL, Smith GC, Vail PJ, Strauss PJ, Levitt PR. Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: a 3-D seismic case history using the Geostack technique. Geophysics. 1994;59(9):1362-1376. doi: 10.1190/1.1443695
- Russell BH, Gray D, Hampson DP. Linearized AVO and poroelasticity. Geophysics. 2011;76(3):C19-C29. doi: 10.1190/1.3555082
- Zong Z, Yin X, Wu G. Elastic impedance parameterization and inversion with Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio. Geophysics. 2013;78(6):N35-N42. doi: 10.1190/geo2012-0529.1
- Lu J, Yang Z, Wang Y, Shi Y. Joint PP and PS AVA seismic inversion using exact Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics. 2015;80(5):R239-R250. doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0490.1
- Zhou L, Liao J, Li J, Chen X, Yang T, Hursthouse A. Bayesian time-lapse difference inversion based on the exact Zoeppritz equations with blockiness constraint. J Environ Eng Geophys. 2020;25(1):89-100. doi: 10.2113/JEEG19-045
- Wang PQ, Liu XY, Li QC, Zhou XW, Feng YF. Nonlinear inversion method of Russell’s fluid factor based on exact-Zoeppritz equation. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2023;61:5913314. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3294501
- Mosser L, Kimman W, Dramsch J, Purves S, de la Fuente Briceño A, Ganssle G. Rapid seismic domain transfer: seismic velocity inversion and modeling using deep generative neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018. Jne 10-July 15, 2018; Copenhagen , Denmark. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers. 2018:1-5. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201800734
- Yu S, Ma J. Deep learning for geophysics: current and future trends. Rev Geophys. 2021;59(3):e2021RG000742. doi: 10.1029/2021RG000742
- Li P, Liu M, Alfarraj M, Tahmasebi P, Grana D. Probabilistic physics-informed neural network for seismic petrophysical inversion. Geophysics. 2024;89(2):M17-M32. doi: 10.1190/geo2023-0214.1
- Wang P, Chen X, Wang B, Li J, Dai H. An improved method for lithology identification based on a hidden Markov model and random forests. Geophysics. 2020;85(6):IM27-IM36. doi: 10.1190/geo2020-0108.1
- Wu X, Liang L, Shi Y, Fomel S. FaultSeg3D: using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3D seismic fault segmentation. Geophysics. 2019;84(3):IM35-IM45. doi: 10.1190/geo2018-0646.1
- Das V, Pollack A, Wollner U, Mukerji T. Convolutional neural network for seismic impedance inversion. In: Proceedings of the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018. October 14-19, 2018; Anaheim, CA. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 2018:2071-2075. doi: 10.1190/segam2018-2994378.1
- Alfarraj M, AlRegib G. Semisupervised sequence modeling for elastic impedance inversion. Interpretation. 2019;7(3):SE237-SE249. doi: 10.1190/INT-2018-0250.1
- Zhang G, Wang Z, Chen Y. Deep learning for seismic lithology prediction. Geophys J Int. 2018;215(2):1368-1387. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggy344
- Li D, Peng S, Guo Y, Lu Y, Cui X, Du W. Progressive multitask learning for high-resolution prediction of reservoir elastic parameters. Geophysics. 2023;88(2):M71-M86. doi: 10.1190/GEO2022-0275.1
- Sun Q, Wang J, Li J, Luo S. AI fu neng you qi hang ye de ying yong jin zhan, fu neng ji li yu fa zhan ce lue. [AI enabling the oil and gas industry: application progress, enabling mechanism, and development strategy.]. Shen Di Neng Yuan Ke Ji. 2025;1(4):128-134. [In Chinese] doi: 10.26987/j.issn.2097-6267.2025.04.012
- Zhang H, Wang Z, Wang H, et al. Intelligent inversion method integrating broad learning and deep neural networks for in-situ stress prediction in strong compression tectonic zones. J Geophys Eng. 2026;23(2):603-614. doi: 10.1093/jge/gxag002
- Qian ZW, Xu K, Zhang H, et al. Ta li mu pen di chao shen fu za di ceng kong xi ya li yu ce fang fa. [Prediction method of pore pressure in ultra-deep complex formations, Tarim Basin.]. Shen Di Neng Yuan Ke Ji. 2025;1(5):35-44. [In Chinese] doi: 10.26987/j.issn.2097-6267.2025.05.004
- Zhu S, Zeng X, Wei M, Peng X, Wang C. Shen di cu ceng fan yan shen tou lv yu shu zhi mo xing de rong he yan jiu. [Integration of reservoir inversion permeability and numerical simulation modeling in deep formations.]. Shen Di Neng Yuan Ke Ji. 2026;2(1):69-73,120. [In Chinese] doi: 10.26987/j.issn.2097-6267.2026.01.007
- Ba J, Xu W, Fu L, Carcione JM, Zhang L. Rock anelasticity due to patchy saturation and fabric heterogeneity: a double double-porosity model of wave propagation. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2017;122(3):1949-1976. doi: 10.1002/2016JB013882
- Papageorgiou G, Chapman M. Wave-propagation in rocks saturated by two immiscible fluids. Geophys J Int. 2017;209(3):1761-1767. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggx128
- Wang P, Cui YA, Li JY, Liu JX. Theoretical model for the elastic properties of cracked fluid-saturated rocks considering the crack connectivity. Geophys J Int. 2024;239(2):1203-1216. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggae330
- Zong Z, Wang Y, Li K, Yin X. Broadband seismic inversion for the low-frequency component of the model parameter. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2018;56(9):5177-5184. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2810845
- Jo H, Cho Y, Pyrcz MJ, Tang H, Fu P. Machine-learning-based porosity estimation from multifrequency poststack seismic data. Geophysics. 2022;87(5):M217-M233. doi: 10.1190/geo2021-0754.1
- Liu Y, Feng D, Xiao Y, et al. Full-waveform inversion of multifrequency GPR data using a multiscale approach based on deep learning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2024;62:5910212. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3382331
- Lundberg SM, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. December 4-9, 2017; Long Beach, CA. NeurIPS 2017. 2017:4768-4777.
- Antonini AS, Tanzola J, Asiain L, et al. Machine learning model interpretability using SHAP values: application to igneous rock classification task. Appl Comput Geosci. 2024;23:100178. doi: 10.1016/j.acags.2024.100178
- Li S, Wei Z, Yang Y, Zhang J, Cheng Y. Petrophysical prediction of oil reservoirs using explainable artificial intelligence. Geophysics. 2025;90(4):M123-M133. doi: 10.1190/geo2024-0271.1
- Chai X, Tang G, Wang S, Lin K, Peng R. Deep learning for irregularly and regularly missing 3-D data reconstruction. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2021;59(7):6244-6265. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3016343
- Biswas R, Sen MK, Das V, Mukerji T. Prestack and poststack inversion using a physics-guided convolutional neural network. Interpretation. 2019;7(3):SE161-SE174. doi: 10.1190/INT-2018-0236.1
- Wang P, Chen X, Li J, Wang B. Lateral constrained prestack seismic inversion based on difference angle gathers. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2021;18(12):2177-2181. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3014815
- Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells WM, Frangi AF, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015. Springer; 2015:234-241. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28
- Wang P, Cui YA, Zhou L, et al. Multi-task learning for seismic elastic parameter inversion with the lateral constraint of angle-gather difference. Pet Sci. 2024;21(6):4001-4009. doi: 10.1016/j.petsci.2024.06.010
- Cheng Z, Ren Y, Du X, Yuan Y. A method based on an attention-guided multibranch residual network for coupled noise suppression in distributed acoustic sensing data. Geophysics. 2025;90(2):V147-V160. doi: 10.1190/geo2024-0096.1
- Aki K, Richards PG. Quantitative Seismology. 2nd ed. Herndon, VA: University Science Books; 2002.
- Oppenheim AV, Schafer RW, Buck JR. Discrete-Time Signal Processing. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1999.
- Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. August 13-17, 2016; San Francisco, CA. Association for Computing Machinery; 2016:785-794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785
- Castagna JP, Batzle ML, Eastwood RL. Relationships between compressional-wave and shear-wave velocities in clastic silicate rocks. Geophysics. 1985;50(4):571-581. doi: 10.1190/1.1441933
- Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017;30:5998-6008.
- Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, et al. An image is worth 16 × 16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. Presented at: International Conference on Learning Representations. 2021.
- Oktay O, Schlemper J, Folgoc LL, et al. Attention U-Net: Learning where to look for the pancreas. arXiv. 2018. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1804.03999
- Schlemper J, Oktay O, Schaap M, et al. Attention gated networks: learning to leverage salient regions in medical images. Med Image Anal. 2019;53:197-207. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.01.012
