ARTICLE

Data conditioning and its improvements on the prestack inversion: a case study from the Xingma area, China

C.Y. Fan Y.Y. Zhang M.W. Sun M. Chen X.F. Jiang Y. Arora I. Tsvankin K. Bai H.Q. Xu X.Y. She L.R. Lines S. Treitel Y. Liu Z.M. Peng Y. Wang Y.M. He Y. Yang J.H. Gao G.W. Zhang Q. Wang Y. Zou A.B. Weglein
JSE 2018, 27(6), 505–514;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Fan, C.Y., Zhang, Y.Y., Sun, M.W., Chen, M. and Jiang, X., 2018. Data conditioning and its improvements on the prestack inversion: a case study from the Xingma Area, China. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 27: 505-514. Seismic data used for prestack inversion and corresponding reservoir characterization should be of high quality, while any undesired prestack seismic phenomena that need to be diminished prior to inversion could possibly suppress the real geology. In an effort to improve the seismic data quality of Xingma area, Liaohe Oil field, China, data conditioning is used in this paper to optimize the match between the synthetic data, used in the prestack inversion, and the real data. The conditioning processes include multiple removal, random noise attenuation, and gather flattening. As the offset increases, the raw amplitudes of target area initially change from weak to strong, and subsequently from strong to weak. But after data conditioning, the amplitudes change from weak to strong. This kind of AVO anomaly is coincident with the synthetics. A comparison of wavelets extracted from four angle stacks found the amplitude and phase spectra of conditioned data to be much more stabilized in 0-42Hz. After data conditioning processing, the average RMS amplitude ratios of inversion residual to seismic demonstrate at least 20% drop in the amplitude, while the inverted Vp/Vs attribute shows a much more compact signature, providing a significant improvement on the accuracy of prestack inversion and corresponding reservoir characterization.

Keywords
data conditioning
prestack inversion
multiple attenuation
reservoir characterization
References
  1. Albinhassan, N.M., Luo, Y. and Mohammed, N.A., 2006. 3D edge-preserving smoothing
  2. and application. Geophysics, 71(4): PS-P11. doi.org/10.1190/1.2213050.
  3. Castagna, J.P., 2001. Recent advances in seismic lithologic analysis. Geophysics, 66:
  4. 42-46. doi.org/10.1190/1.1444918.
  5. CGG: Geosoftware, 2018. https://www.cgg.com/en/What-We-Do/GeoSoftware.
  6. Cook, D., Constance, P., Singleton, S. and Harris, P., 2016. Introduction to special
  7. section: Seismic data conditioning. Interpretation, 4(2): SGi-SGi.
  8. doi.org/10.1190/INT-2016-03 14-SPSEINTRO. 1.
  9. Estrada, J., Aaron, P. and Eden, R., 2015. Target oriented data conditioning for prestack
  10. inversion in an unconventional reservoir, a Canadian case study. Interpreation,
  11. 4(2): SG11-SG18. doi.org/ 10.1190/INT-2015-0149.1.
  12. Gao, X.Z., Li, X.G, Li, J.S, Shan, J.F, Xie, Y.B. and Liu, B.H., 2007. Sandstone
  13. distribution pattern and the exploration of lithologic reservoirs in the Es 3
  14. poms of Xinglongtai area, Liaohe Depression. Petrol. Explor. Develop., 34:
  15. Gulunay, N., Magesan, M. and Roende, H., 2007. Gather flattening. The Leading Edge,
  16. 26: 1538-1543. doi.org/10.1190/1.2821939.
  17. Hampson, D., 1987. The discrete Radon transform: A new tool for image enhancement
  18. and noise suppression. Expanded Abstr., 57th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., New
  19. Orleans: 141-143. doi.org/10.1190/1.1892134.
  20. Hinkley, D., Bear, G. and Dawson, C., 2004. Prestack gather flattening for AVO.
  21. Expanded Abstr., 74th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver: 271-273.
  22. doi.org/10.1190/1.1839719.
  23. Liu, D., 2013. The effects of prestack seismic data conditioning on AVO analysis.
  24. Expanded Abstr., 83rd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 452-456.
  25. doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-1323.1.
  26. Singleton, S., 2008. The effects of seismic data conditioning on pre-stack simultaneous
  27. impedance i inversion. Expanded Abstr., 78th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas:
  28. 1506-1510. doi.org/10.1190/1. 3059200.
  29. Singleton, S., 2009. The effects of seismic data conditioning on prestack simultaneous
  30. impedance inversion. The Leading Edge, 28: 772-781.
  31. doi.org/10.1190/1.3167776.
  32. Skidmore, C., Kelly, M. and Ford, D.A., 2003. Quality controlling AVO inversion
  33. products: examples of Amplitude Decomposition into rock property contrasts.
  34. Expanded Abstr., 73rd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Dallas: 246-249.
  35. doi.org/10.1190/1.1817886.
  36. Swan, H.W., 2001. Velocities from amplitude variations with offset. Geophysics, 66:
  37. 1735-1743. doi.org/10.1190/1.1487115.
  38. Wang, U., Wang, X.M. and Du, Q.Z., 2009. The impact of processing on AVO and
  39. primary waveform extraction for AVO. Expanded Abstr., 79th Ann. Internat.
  40. SEG Mtg., Houston: 351-355. doi.org/10.1190/1.3255595.
  41. Yu, J.B. and Liu, D., 2012. An application of structural filter and Gabor deconvolution
  42. for AVO processing. Expanded Abstr., 82nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas:
  43. 1-4. doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-1472.1
  44. Zhang, B., Chang, D.S., Lin, T.F. and Marfurt, K.J., 2014. Improving the quality of
  45. prestack inversion by prestack data conditioning. Interpreation, 3(1): T5-T12.
  46. doi.org/10.1190/INT-2014-0124.1.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing