ARTICLE

Spectral decomposition and AVO-based amplitude decomposition: a comparative study and application

MOHAMMED FARFOUR1 WANG JUNG YOON2 SAID GACI3 NOUREDDINE OUABED4
Show Less
1 Earth Science Dept., Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.,
2 Energy & Resources Engineering Dept., Chonnam University, Gwangju, South Korea.,
3 Algerian Institute of Petroleum, Boumerdes, Algeria.,
4 Sinopec Geophysical Corporation, Algiers, Algeria.,
JSE 2020, 29(3), 261–273;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Farfour, M., Yoon, W.J., Gaci, S. and Ouabed, N., 2020. Spectral decomposition and AVO-based Amplitude Decomposition: a comparative study and application. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 29: 261-273. Seismic data are very rich in information about rocks and fluids saturating their pores. As a result of their unique mineralogical compositions and fluid properties that discriminate them from their surroundings, hydrocarbon-saturated formations have proved to have their own characteristic frequencies at which they preferentially show up in seismic data. This has provided considerable support to interpretations of spectral decomposition methods and led to great success in detecting hydrocarbons in many basins of the world. Early works in Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) proved that geological formations containing hydrocarbons have also their own amplitude expressions with which they respond to seismic excitations. These seismic responses are controlled by their lithology type, pore space, and fluid content. This in turn has supported interpretations of strong amplitude anomalies observed at top of hydrocarbon- saturated reservoirs and led to the success of AVO in many areas around the globe. In this study, AVO-based amplitude decomposition is introduced as a new way to look at seismic amplitudes from AVO. The amplitude decomposition is compared with the decomposition of frequencies concept and methods. Both decompositions are examined over a gas-saturated sandstone from Alberta, Canada. Results demonstrated that decomposing both amplitude and frequency of seismic data into their constituent components can help detect more reliable expressions from fluid-saturated formations. The study shows that the Intercept and Gradient can be used to reproduce partial stacks and also gathers and suggests that the two attributes can be thought of as alternative products to partial stacks.

Keywords
Amplitude Variation with Offset
spectral decomposition
hydrocarbon
References
  1. Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. W.H.
  2. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA.
  3. Castagna, J.P., Sun, S. and Siegfried, R.W., 2003. Instantaneous spectral analysis:
  4. Detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons. The Leading
  5. Edge, 22: 120-127.
  6. Chakraborty, A. and Okaya, D., 1995. Frequency-time decomposition of seismic data
  7. using wavelet-based methods. Geophysics, 60: 1906-1910.
  8. Chen, G., Matteucci, G., Fahmi, B. and Finn, Ch., 2008. Spectral-decomposition response
  9. to reservoir fluids from a deepwater West Africa reservoir. Geophysics 73, C2-C30.
  10. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and
  11. Reservoir Characterization. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
  12. Downton, J.E., Russell, B-H. and Lines, L.R. 2000. AVO for managers: pitfalls and
  13. solutions. CREWES Research Report, 12.
  14. Farfour, M., Yoon, W.J. and Jang, S., 2016. Energy-weighted Amplitude Variation with
  15. Offset: an AVO attribute for low impedance gas sands. J. Appl. Geophys., 123(6):
  16. 167-177
  17. Farfour, M. and Gaci, S., 2018. Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition to
  18. detect hydrocarbons: comparison and application. RDPETRO 2018: Res.
  19. Develop. Petrol. Conf., Abu Dhabi, UAE, May 2018: 144-147.
  20. Farfour, M., Yoon, W.J. and Kim, J. 2015. Seismic attributes and acoustic impedance
  21. inversion in interpretation of complex hydrocarbon reservoirs. J. Appl. Geophys.,
  22. 111: 66-75.
  23. Han, J. and van der Baan, M., 2013. Empirical mode decomposition for seismic time-
  24. frequency analysis. Geophysics, 78(2): O9-O19.
  25. Hendrickson, J., 1999. Stacked. Geophys. Prosp., 47: 663-705.
  26. Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, H.H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung,
  27. C.C. and Liu, H.H., 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert
  28. spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. Roy. Soc.
  29. London, Series A: Mathemat., Phys. Engineer. Sci., 454: 903-995.
  30. Li, Y., Downton, J. and Xu, Y., 2007. Practical aspects of AVO modeling. The Leading
  31. Edge,
  32. Loizou, N. and Chen, S., 2012. The application and value of AVO and spectral
  33. decomposition for derisking Palaeogene prospects in the UK North Sea. First Break,
  34. 30: 55-67.
  35. Ostrander, W.J., 1984. Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at non-normal
  36. angles of incidence. Geophysics, 49: 1637-1648.
  37. Rutherford, S.R. and Williams, R.H., 1989. Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas
  38. sands. Geophysics, 54: 680-688
  39. Shuey, R.T., 1985. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics, 50: 609-614.
  40. Sinha, S., Routh, P., Anno, P. and Castagna, J.P., 2005. Spectral decomposition of
  41. seismic data with continuous-wavelet transform. Geophysics, 70(6): P19-P25.
  42. Stockwell, R.G., Mansinha, L. and Lowe, R.P., 1996. Localization of the complex
  43. spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Transact. Signal Process., 44: 998-1001.
  44. Tai, S., Puryear, P. and Castagna, J.P., 2009. Local frequency as a direct hydrocarbon
  45. indicator. Expanded Abstr., 79th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 2160-2164.
  46. Torres, M.E., Colominas, M.A., Schlotthauer, G. and Flandrin, P., 2011. A complete
  47. ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. IEEE Internat. Conf.
  48. Acoust., Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP): 41444147
  49. Wiggins, R., Kenny, G.S. and McClure, C.D., 1983. A method for determining and
  50. displaying the shear-velocity refiectivities of a geologic formation. European Patent
  51. Applicat. 0113944.
  52. Wu, Z. and Huang, N.E., 2009. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-
  53. assisted data analysis method. Advan. Adapt. Data Analys., 1: 141.
  54. Yoon, W.J. and Farfour, M., 2012. Spectral decomposition aids AVO analysis in
  55. reservoir characterization: a case study of Blackfoot field, AB, Canada. J. Computers
  56. Geosci., 46: 60-65.
  57. Zoeppritz, K., 1919. Erdbebenwellen VIIIB, On the reflection and propagation of seismic
  58. waves. GOttinger Nachrichten, I, 66-84.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing