Approximation error approach in AVA inversion for compensating for modeling errors between the exact Zoeppritz equations and their approximations
In pre-stack seismic amplitude variation with incident angle (AVA) inversion, observational noise is typically modeled as a Gaussian distribution with 0 mean and known (constant) covariance. Commonly, the forward equation of AVA inversion is based on Zoeppritz equations. But in practice, due to the complexity of the exact Zoeppritz equations, approximations are frequently used in industry to rapidly calculate AVA inversion. These approximations assume small elastic parameter contrasts. There is no significant loss of precision when the assumption is approximately satisfied. The approximations become less accurate for large elastic parameter contrasts. The essential reason is that the approximations can introduce model errors. This study employs a Bayesian approach to comprehensively characterize the statistics of model errors between the exact Zoeppritz equations and their approximations. Specifically, the Bayesian approximation error method is used to handle model errors, compensating for errors introduced by approximations of the Zoeppritz equations. Then, these model-error statistics are applied to AVA inversion for elastic parameters based on Bayesian theory. The synthetic data tests and real seismic data applications showed that the proposed AVA inversion method can improve the precision and accuracy of inverted elastic parameters to a certain extent, with little additional computational cost compared to AVA inversion based on approximations without model-error compensation.
- Fatti JL, Smith GC, Vail PJ, Strauss PJ, Levitt PR. Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: A 3-D seismic case history using the Geostack technique. Geophysics. 1994;59(9):1362-1376. doi: 10.1190/1.1443695
- Goodway B, Chen T, Downton J. Improved AVO fluid detection and lithology discrimination using Lamé petrophysical parameters, “λρ”,”μρ”, & “λ/μ fluid stack”, from P and S inversions. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1997. Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 1997:183-186. doi: 10.1190/1.1885795
- Zhang F, Dai R. Nonlinear inversion of pre-stack seismic data using variable metric method. J Appl Geophys. 2016;129:111-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.03.035
- Xiao S, Ba J, Guo Q, Carcione JM, Zhang L, Luo C. Seismic pre-stack AVA inversion scheme based on lithology constraints. J Geophys Eng. 2020;17(3):411-428. doi: 10.1093/jge/gxaa001
- Zoeppritz K. Erdbebenwellen VIII B. Über reflexion und durchgang seismischer wellen durch unstetigkeitsflächen. Gottinger Nachr. 1919;1:66-84.
- Aki K, Richards PG. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman; 1980:115-120. Accessed March 15, 2026. https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:58794764
- Shuey R. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics. 1985;50(4):609-614. doi: 10.1190/1.1441936
- Russell BH, Gray D, Hampson DP. Linearized AVO and poroelasticity. Geophysics. 2011;76(3):C19-C29. doi: 10.1190/1.3555082
- Lu J, Yang Z, Wang Y, Shi Y. Joint PP and PS AVA seismic inversion using exact Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics. 2015;80(5):R239-R250. doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0490.1
- Zhou L, Li J, Chen X, Liu X, Chen L. Prestack AVA inversion of exact Zoeppritz equations based on modified Trivariate Cauchy distribution. J Appl Geophys. 2017;138:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.01.009
- Lehocki I, Mukerji T, Avseth P, Jensen EH. Algorithms for extraction of reliable density ratios from pre‐stack seismic data—Part 1: Theory. Geophys Prospect. 2025;73(6):e70029. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.70029
- Ye T, Li J, Ding W, Long F, Yang J, Liu C. Application of full-angle prestack density inversion for deep tidal-flat thin dolomite reservoirs [in Chinese]. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2024;63(6):1203-1213. doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2024.63.06.011
- Li H. Prestack seismic prediction technique for ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs in Shunbei field [in Chinese]. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2025;64(4):736-748. doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2025.0027
- Sun W, Chen Z, Wang R, Duan M. Research on fluid identification technology of submarine fan reservoirs: A case study of Meishan Formation in Ledong–Lingshui Sag [in Chinese]. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2025;64(6):1107-1117. doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2024.0230
- Zhang P, Xiao Y, Xiao P, Chen P, Xu W. A fluid factor inversion method using the frequency-domain two-step sub-band regularization. J Seism Explor. 2025;34(5):1-17. doi: 10.36922/JSE025310048
- Bao Y, Chen J, Liu XB, Zhao ZC. Joint PP and PS anisotropic AVO inversion using the exact Zoeppritz equations. J Seism Explor. 2021;30(6):529-544. doi: 10.36922/JSE77
- Arridge SR, Kaipio JP, Kolehmainen V, et al. Approximation errors and model reduction with an application in optical diffusion tomography. Inverse Probl. 2006;22(1):175. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/1/010
- Tarvainen T, Kolehmainen V, Pulkkinen A, et al. An approximation error approach for compensating for modelling errors between the radiative transfer equation and the diffusion approximation in diffuse optical tomography. Inverse Probl. 2009;26(1):015005. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/26/1/015005
- Tarvainen T, Pulkkinen A, Cox BT, Kaipio JP, Arridge SR. Bayesian image reconstruction in quantitative photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013;32(12):2287- 2298. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2280281
- Sahlström T, Pulkkinen A, Tick J, Leskinen J, Tarvainen T. Modeling of errors due to uncertainties in ultrasound sensor locations in photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39(6):2140-2150. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2020.2966297
- Wang P, Chen XH, Li J, Wang B. Accurate porosity prediction for tight sandstone reservoir: A case study from North China. Geophysics. 2020;85(2):B35-B47. doi: 10.1190/geo2018-0852.1
- Wang P, Cui YA, Liu J. Fluid Discrimination Based on Inclusion-Based Method for Tight Sandstone Reservoirs. Surv Geophys. 2022;43(5):1469-1496. doi: 10.1007/s10712-022-09712-5
- Grana D, Fjeldstad T, Omre H. Bayesian Gaussian mixture linear inversion for geophysical inverse problems. Math Geosci. 2017;49(4):493-515. doi: 10.1007/s11004-016-9671-9
- Zhang FQ, Wei FJ, Wang YC, et al. Generalized linear AVO inversion with the priori constraint of trivariate Cauchy distribution based on Zoeppritz equation [in Chinese]. Chin J Geophys. 2013;56(6):2098-2115. doi: 10.6038/cjg20130630
- Wang Y. Seismic Inversion: Theory and Applications. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2017:24-40.
- Aster RC, Borchers B, Thurber CH. Parameter Estimation and Inverse Problems. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018:93-134.
- Kaipio J, Somersalo E. Statistical inverse problems: Discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes. J Comput Appl Math. 2007;198(2):493-504. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2005.09.027
- Du X, Li G, Zhou Z, Zhang W, Tang B. Band-controlled sparse deconvolution. J Appl Geophys. 2018;155:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.05.012
- Wen X, Yang J, Li L, He J, Li B. Low-frequency sparse double-constrained broadband seismic impedance inversion. Nat Gas Ind B. 2019;6(6):556-563. doi: 10.1016/j.ngib.2019.05.003
- Ba D, Babadi B, Purdon PL, Brown EN. Convergence and stability of iteratively re-weighted least squares algorithms. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2014;62(1):183-195. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2287685
- Zhang SX, Yin XY, Zhang FC. Ji yu san bian liang ke xi fen bu xian yue shu de die qian san can shu fan yan fang fa [Prestack three term inversion method based on Trivariate Cauchy distribution prior constraint]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2011;46(5):737-743. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2011.05.013
- Dai R, Yin C. Elastic Impedance Inversion With Gramian Constraint for Simultaneously Inverting Multiple Partial Angle Stack Seismic Data. Geophys Prospect. 2025;73(6):e70056. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.70056
