ARTICLE

Method of complex interpretation of spectral decomposition for seismic facies analysis and parametrization of lithological traps

ALBINA BELAEVA* DAMIR MURTAZIN
Show Less
1 Department of Informatics and Information Technologies, Federal State Budgetary Educational Establishment of Higher Education “Bashkir State Agrarian University”, Ufa 450001, Russian Federation,
2 Gazpromnrft STC, Saint Petersburg 190000, Russian Federation,
JSE 2022, 31(3), 239–251;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Belaeva, A. and Murtazin, D., 2022. Method of complex interpretation of spectral decomposition for seismic facies analysis and parametrization of lithological traps. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 31: 239-251. The study aims at creating a method for complex interpretation of spectral decomposition for seismic facies analysis, parametrization of potential lithological traps, prediction of effective reservoir thicknesses in the inter-well space and risk reduction in the assessment of reserves and resources. The method of spectral decomposition using the Wavelet transform was applied during the research. This method of seismic route decomposition was used as part of the proposed methodology. Many clustering methods from the Sklern Python library were used. The study placed a premium on the KMeans methods. Correlation analysis and qualitative interpretation of the obtained seismic images were used to link geological and seismic information. The developed method of sorting the centres of spectral curves clusters allowed a joint analysis of wells data and clustering results. The developed approach was applied to comprehensively study the paleochannel systems of the West Siberian, Timan-Pechora and Volga-Ural oil and gas provinces. The advantages of the proposed technology over attribute analysis, spectral characteristics analysis and RGB blending were proved by comparing the deposits of the above-mentioned provinces. Various geological objects in the wavefield were identified using qualitative interpretation and then linked with wells data. This technology proved to be the best when using quantitative interpretation. High correlation coefficients between the effective thicknesses in wells and the results of spectral curves clustering were obtained.

Keywords
3D seismic measurements
dynamic interpretation
RGB Blending
spectral decomposition
clustering of amplitude-frequency spectra
terrigenous deposits
References
  1. Al-Maghlouth, M., Szafian, P. and Bell, R., 2017. Characterizing carbonate facies using
  2. high-definition frequency decomposition: Case study from North West
  3. Australia. Interpretation, 5(3): SJ49-SJ59.
  4. Bataller, F.J., McDougall, N. and Moscariello, A., 2019. Ordovician glacial
  5. paleogeography: Integration of seismic spectral decomposition, well
  6. sedimentological data, and glacial modern analogs in the Murzuq Basin,
  7. Libya. Interpretation, 7(2): T383-T408.
  8. Butorin, A.V., 2016. Study of geological objects of the Achimov suit using spectral
  9. decomposition of the wavefield. Geophysics, 4(1): 61-67. (In Russian)
  10. Butorin, A.V. and Krasnov, F.V., 2016. Comparative analysis of spectral inversion
  11. methods on the example of model traces. Geophysics, 4(1): 68-76. (In Russian)
  12. Castagna, J.P. and Sun, S., 2006. Comparison of spectral decomposition methods. First
  13. Break, 24(3): 75-79.
  14. Chakraborty, A. and Okaya, D., 1995. Frequency-time decomposition of seismic data
  15. using wavelet-based methods. Geophysics, 60: 1906-1916.
  16. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2015. Choice of mother wavelets in CWT spectral
  17. decomposition. Expanded Abstr., 85th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., New Orleans:
  18. 2957-2961.
  19. Cooke, N., Szafian, P., Gruenwald, R. and Schuler, L., 2014. Forward modelling to
  20. understand colour responses in an HDFD RGB blend around a gas discovery. First
  21. Break, 32(4): 87-93.
  22. Dewett, D.T., Pigott, J.D. and Marfurt, K.J., 2021. A review of seismic attribute
  23. taxonomies, discussion of their historical use, and presentation of a seismic
  24. attribute communication framework using data analysis concepts. Interpretation,
  25. 9(3): B39-B64.
  26. Fan, X., Li, Y., Zhou, Y. and He, P., 2017. A method of classified RGB fusion of multi-
  27. scale curvature attributes based on the image background subtraction.
  28. In: International Geophysical Conf., Qingdao, China, 17-20 April 2017. SEG and
  29. Chinese Petroleum Soc.: 601-604.
  30. Feng, C., Sun, M., Liu, C., Deng, X., Xue, Y. and Dong, L., 2020. Seismic sedimentary
  31. characteristics and filling structure of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation,
  32. Ordos Basin, China. Interpretation, 8(2): T259-T274.
  33. Gao, H., Wu, X. and Liu, G., 2020. Channel simulation and deep learning for channel
  34. interpretation in 3D seismic images. SEG Internat. Exposit. Ann. Mtg., OnePetro,
  35. Richardson, Texas.
  36. Hamerli, Z., Reilly, M. and Hurter, S., 2019. Spectral decomposition of the
  37. heterogeneous springbok sandstone and walloon coal measures in the Surat Basin,
  38. Australia. SPE/AAPG/SEG Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Technology
  39. Conf., OnePetro, Richardson, Texas.
  40. Khonde, K. and Rastogi, R., 2013. Recent developments in spectral decomposition of
  41. seismic data (techniques and applications): A review. Expanded Abstr. PID P028
  42. presented at ‘Changing Landscapes in Geophysical Innovations’—10th Biennial
  43. Internat. Conf. Exposit., Kerala, India, 23: 25.
  44. McArdle, N. and Paton, G., 2014. Comparison of spectral enhancement techniques
  45. applied to post stack data. Extended Abstr., 76th EAGE Conf., Amsterdam: 1-5.
  46. Meza, R.G., Sierra, J., Castagna, J.P. and Barbato, U., 2018. Joint time-variant spectral
  47. analysis - Part 1: Forward modeling the effects of thin-bed layering.
  48. Interpretation, 6(4): T967-T983.
  49. Miao, X., Todorovic-Marinic, D. and Klatt, T., 2007. Enhancing seismic insight by
  50. spectral decomposition. SEG Annual Mtg., OnePetro, Richardson, Texas.
  51. Murtazin, D.G., 2016. Spectral decomposition - new opportunities for detailed dynamic
  52. analysis of seismic data. Geophysics, 5(1): 68-73. (in Russian)
  53. Murtazin, D.G. and Sirazhiev, A.A., 2017. Clustering of amplitude-frequency spectra - a
  54. new approach to solving complex geological and geophysical problems.
  55. Geophysics, 2(1): 37-45. (In Russian)
  56. Ni, C., Hu, G., Liu, H., Su, M. and Ma, H., 2019. Thin-bed detection using amplitude
  57. slicing at minimum interference frequency: Method and application. Interpretation,
  58. 7(1): T113-T126.
  59. Olneva, T.V. and Zhukovskaya, E.A., 2016. Seismic imaging of geological processes
  60. and phenomena: Channel deposits of continental sedimentation environments.
  61. Geophysics, 2(1): 2-9. (In Russian)
  62. Olneva, T.V. and Zhukovskaya, E.A., 2017. Parametrization of paleochannel sinusoidal
  63. for facial reconstructions and object modelling. Geophysics, 4(1): 41-46. (In
  64. Russian)
  65. Olneva, T.V., Zhukovskaya, E.A., and Murtazin, D.G., 2018. The influence of
  66. meandering paleochannels type on the potential volume of lithologic traps, and the
  67. efficiency of geological exploration. Geophysics, 4(1): 73-79. (In Russian)
  68. Partyka, G., Gridley, J. and Lopez, J., 1999. Interpretational applications of spectral
  69. decomposition in reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge, 18: 353-360.
  70. Rioul, O. and Vetterli, M., 1991. Wavelets and signal processing. IEEE SP Magazine,
  71. 8(4): 14-38.
  72. Xiang, K., Yang, Y., Huang, H., Luo, Y. and Jiang, M., 2021. Joint impedance inversion
  73. and spectral decomposition for deepwater gas reservoir characterization: A case
  74. study in South China Sea. Interpretation, 9(1): T63-T77.
  75. Yuan, Z., Huang, H., Jiang, Y., Tang, J. and Li, J., 2019. An enhanced fault-detection
  76. method based on adaptive spectral decomposition and super-resolution deep
  77. learning. Interpretation, 7(3): T713-T725.
  78. Zeng, H., 2017. Thickness imaging for high-resolution stratigraphic interpretation by
  79. linear combination and color blending of multiple-frequency panels.
  80. Interpretation, 5(3): T411-T422.
  81. Zhang, X., Xu, D., Ding, H., Gong, M. and Zhou, X., 2017, September. The vertical
  82. superimposed pattern and lateral variation of reservoir in complex Sandy Braided
  83. River sediments: An example from southern Bohai Bay, China. SEG Internat.
  84. Exposit. Ann. Mtg., OnePetro, Richardson, Texas.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing