ARTICLE

A 3C/3D seismic analysis of the Appalachian Basin Hamilton Group, Northeastern Pennsylvania

MICHAEL V. DEANGELO BOB A. HARDAGE
Show Less
Bureau of Economic Geology, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78713-8924, U.S.A.,
JSE 2013, 22(3), 271–293;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

DeAngelo, M.V. and Hardage, B.A., 2013. A 3C/3D seismic analysis of the Appalachian Basin Hamilton Group, Northeastern Pennsylvania. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 22: 271-293. A 3D multicomponent seismic study was initiated in Northeastern Pennsylvania to determine if these emerging technologies could improve the geological understanding of the Appalachian Basin Hamilton Group with regards to hydrocarbon exploration and waste-storage management. By comparing conventional P-P wave data with P-SV wave data, it was demonstrated that these concepts could help reduce exploration risk and minimize environmental impact by improving reservoir characterization, identifying possible zones of increased fracture density, and help locate potential subsurface waste-water intervals to safely store any fluid generated from drilling activities in environmentally sensitive areas.

Keywords
3C/3D seismic
interpretation
fractures
anisotropy
Marcellus shale
Tully/Tichenor sandstones
References
  1. Bruner, K.R. and Smosna, R., 1994. Porosity development in Devonian lithic sandstones of the
  2. Appalachian foreland basin. Northeast. Geol., 16: 202-214.
  3. DeAngelo, M.V., Backus, M., Hardage, B., Murray, P. and Knapp, S., 2003. Depth registration
  4. of P-wave and C-wave seismic data for shallow marine sediment characterization, Gulf of
  5. Mexico. The Leading Edge, 22: 96-105.
  6. Diecchio, R.J., 1985. Post-Martinsburg Ordovician stratigraphy of Virginia and West Virginia.
  7. Virginia Div. Mineral Res., Publicat. 57: 77 pp.
  8. Engelder, T., Lash, G.G. and Uzcategui, R.S., 2009. Joint sets that enhance production from
  9. Middle and Upper Devonian gas shales of the Appalachian Basin. AAPG Bull. , 93: 857-889,
  10. doi: 10.1306/03230908032.
  11. Hill, C.G., 2002. Fractured Shale Gas Potential in New York. Rep. New York State Energy Res.
  12. Develop. Author.: 1-49.
  13. Milici, R.C. and Swezey, S., 2006. Assessment of Appalachian Basin oil and gas resources:
  14. Devonian shale - Middle and Upper Paleozoic total petroleum system. USGS Open-File Rep.
  15. 2006-1237: 70 pp.
  16. Roen, J.B., 1984. Geology of the Devonian Black Shales of the Appalachian basin. Organ.
  17. Geochem., 5: 241-254.
  18. Soeder, D.J., 1988. Porosity and permeability of eastern Devonian gas shale. Soc. Petrol. Engin.
  19. Format. Evaluat., SPE, 3: 116-124, doi: 10.2118/15213-PA.
  20. Tatham, R.H. and McCormick, M.D., 1991. Multicomponent Seismology in Petroleum Exploration.
  21. SEG, Tulsa: 248 pp.
  22. Zeng, H., Henry, S.C. and Riola, J.P., 1998. Stratal slicing, Part II: Real seismic data. Geophysics,
  23. 63: 514-522.
  24. Zeng, H., Hentz, T.F. and Wood, L.J., 2001. Stratal slicing of Miocene-Pliocene sediments in
  25. Vermilion block 50 - Tiger Shoal area, offshore Louisiana. The Leading Edge, 20: 408-418.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing