ARTICLE

Applications of empirical mode decomposition in random noise attenuation of seismic data

YANGKANG CHEN1 CHAO ZHOU2 JIANG YUAN3 ZHAOYU JIN3
Show Less
1 Bureau of Economic Geology, John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, University Station, Box X, Austin, TX 78713-8924, U.S.A.,
2 State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Fuxue Road 18th, Beijing 102200, P.R. China.,
3 Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, U.K.,
JSE 2014, 23(5), 481–495;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Chen, Y., Zhou, C., Yuan, J. and Jin, Z., 2014. Applications of empirical mode decomposition in random noise attenuation of seismic data. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 23: 481-495. In this paper, we give an exclusive introduction about the applications of empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to random noise attenuation of seismic data. EMD can be used to denoise each 1D signal from the 2D seismic profile in time-space (t-x) domain either along the time direction or space direction. However, because of the mode-mixing problem, t-x domain EMD along the time direction will cause some damage to a useful seismic signal. A better.way is to apply EMD along the space direction and remove the highly oscillating components. The frequency-space (f-x) domain EMD can help obtain faster implementation and even better performances. In order to deal with complex seismic profiles, a hybrid denoising approach based on f-x EMD is also introduced. The hybrid denoising approach can also be inserted into an iterative blending noise attenuation framework, and can help obtain better results. We use both synthetic and field data examples to demonstrate the proposed applications of EMD.

Keywords
empirical mode decomposition
random noise attenuation
t-x EMD
f-x EMD
iterative blending noise attenuation
shaping regularization
References
  1. Abma, R. and Claerbout, J., 1995. Lateral prediction for noise attenuation by t-x and f-x techniques.
  2. Geophysics, 60: 1887-1896.
  3. Bekara, M. and van der Baan, M., 2009. Random and coherent noise attenuation by empirical mode
  4. decomposition. Geophysics, 74: V89-V98.
  5. Canales, L., 1984. Random noise reduction. Expanded Abstr., 54th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg.,
  6. Atlanta: 525-527.
  7. Chen, W., Wang, S., Zhang, Z. and Chuai, X., 2012. Noise reduction based on wavelet threshold
  8. filtering and ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Expanded Abstr., 82nd Ann. Internat.
  9. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas: 1-6.
  10. Chen, Y., Fomel, S. and Hu, J., 2014. Iterative deblending of simultaneous-source seismic data
  11. using seislet-domain shaping regularization. Geophysics, 79: V179-V189.
  12. Chen, Y. and Ma, J., 2014. Random noise attenuation by f-x empirical mode decomposition
  13. predictive filtering. Geophysics, 79: V81-V91.
  14. Dong, L., Li, Z. and Wang, D., 2013. Curvelet threshold denoising joint with empirical mode
  15. decomposition. Expanded Abstr., 83rd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 4412-4416.
  16. Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, H.H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung, C.C.
  17. and Liu, H.H., 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for
  18. nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Series A, 454:
  19. 903-995.
  20. Kopecky, M., 2010. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: Image data analysis with white-noise
  21. reflection. Acta Polytechn., 50: 49-56.
  22. Kopsinis, Y., 2009. Development of emd-based denoising methods inspired by wavelet thresholding.
  23. Signal Process., IEEE Transact., 57: 1351-1362.
  24. Mao, Y. and Que, P., 2007. Noise suppression and flaw detection of ultrasonic signals via empirical
  25. mode decomposition. Rus. J. Nondestruct. Test., 43: 196-203.
  26. Neelamani, R., Baumstein, A., Gillard, D., Hadidi, M. and Soroka, W., 2008. Coherent and
  27. random noise attenuation using the curvelet transform. The Leading Edge, 27: 240-248.
  28. Oropeza, V. and Sacchi, M., 2011. Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via
  29. multichannel singular spectrum analysis. Geophysics, 76: V25-V32.
  30. Torres, M.E., Colominas, M.A., Schlotthauer, G. and Flandrin, P., 2011. A complete ensemble
  31. empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. IEEE Internat. Conf. Acoustics, Speech
  32. and Signal Process. (ICASSP), 4144-4147.
  33. Wu, Z. and Huang, N.E., 2009. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data
  34. analysis method. Advances in Adapt. Data Anal., 1: 1-41.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing