AccScience Publishing / JSE / Volume 0 / Issue 0 / DOI: 10.36922/JSE026150062
ARTICLE

High-precision fracture–cavity identification using joint frequency–phase seismic attributes

Yong Wang1* Shenyao Wu1 Menglin Zhang2 Huiyan Zhao1 De Heng1
Show Less
1 Sichuan Changning Natural Gas Development Co., Ltd., Yibin, Sichuan, China
2 Research Institute of Geological Exploration and Development, Petro China Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Received: 17 April 2026 | Revised: 11 June 2026 | Accepted: 16 June 2026 | Published online: 15 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Accurate identification of fracture–cavity systems is crucial for carbonate reservoir characterization and drilling-risk reduction. However, conventional seismic attribute methods are often limited by strong multi-solution ambiguity and low sensitivity to weak, heterogeneous, and non-stationary fracture–cavity responses. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a fracture–cavity identification method based on a unified sparse time–frequency–phase (TFP) atom decomposition framework and applies it to the Maokou Formation in the Yi-202 well area of the Sichuan Basin. In this framework, seismic traces are represented as a sparse superposition of TFP atoms characterized by amplitude, arrival time, dominant frequency, and initial phase. An L1-regularized sparse inversion, solved by a fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm, is first used to obtain a spectrally enhanced, high-resolution trace. Analytic matching pursuit is then employed to extract TFP atoms and jointly estimate time, frequency, and phase, followed by coordinate-descent refinement to improve decomposition accuracy and stability. Based on the refined atom dictionary, a joint frequency–phase energy volume is constructed, from which band-selective reconstructions and a Kullback–Leibler divergence anomaly indicator are derived. Compared with conventional methods that primarily rely on amplitude or single-frequency attributes, the proposed method jointly exploits frequency and phase information, thereby improving the discrimination of subtle fracture–cavity anomalies and reducing interpretation uncertainty. Field-data application demonstrates that the method can more clearly delineate small-scale fracture–cavity anomalies that are difficult to identify using conventional approaches, highlighting its practical value for carbonate reservoir prediction and drilling-risk mitigation.

Keywords
Sparse time–frequency representation
Joint phase–frequency attributes
Spectra analysis
Phase decomposition
Fracture–cavity identification
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
References
  1. Zou CN, Chen YP, Xiong B, et al. Tanzhonghe mubiao xia zhongguo xinnengyuan shi ming [Mission of New Energy under Carbon Neutrality Goal in China]. Bull Chin Acad Sci. 2023;38(1):48-58. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220831001
  2. Su PD, Qin QR, Huang RQ. Chuceng liefeng yuce yanjiu xianzhuang yu zhanwang [Prospects and Status for the Study on Reservoir Fractures]. J Southwest Pet Inst. 2005;27(5):14-17. [In Chinese].
  3. Jiang RQ, Wu J, Castagna J, et al. Diqiu wuli jishu zui xin jinzhan: gao fenbianlü dizhen pinlü he xiangwei shuxing fenxi jishu yanjiu yu yingyong xiaoguo [Recent advances in geophysical technology: High-resolution seismic frequency and phase analysis techniques and applications]. Earth Sci Front. 2023;30(1):199-212. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2022.8.36
  4. Ouyang YL, Song W, Zeng QC, et al. Gao baozhen gao xinzaobi dizhen ziliao de huoqu fangfa [Seismic data acquisition method with high fidelity and high signal to noise ratio]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2016;51(1):32-39. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2016.01.005
  5. Bashir Y, Kemerli BD, Yılmaz T, et al. Reconstruction of subsurface potential hydrocarbon reservoirs through 3D seismic automatic interpretation and attribute analysis. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C. 2024;136:103751. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2024.103751
  6. Bashir Y, Akdeniz DN, Balci D, et al. 3D geo-seismic data enhancement leveraging geophysical attributes for hydrocarbon prospect and geological illumination. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C. 2025;138:103854. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2025.103854
  7. Bashir Y, Siddiqui NA, Morib DL, et al. Cohesive approach for determining porosity and P-impedance in carbonate rocks using seismic attributes and inversion analysis. J Pet Explor Prod Technol. 2024;14(5):1173-1187. doi: 10.1007/s13202-024-01767-x
  8. Gammaldi S, Ismail A, Zollo A. Fluid accumulation zone by seismic attributes and amplitude versus offset analysis at Solfatara Volcano, Campi Flegrei, Italy. Front Earth Sci. 2022;10:866534. doi: 10.3389/feart.2022.866534
  9. Metwalli FI, Ismail A, Pigott JD. Advances in seismic and well log in the exploration in north Africa. In: The Geology of North Africa. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2024:557-589. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-48299-1_19
  10. Ismail A, Gammaldi S, Chiuso T, Zollo A. Seismic imaging of the Solfatara crater (Campi Flegrei caldera, southern Italy): new evidence of the fluids migration pathways in the shallow structures. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 2020;404:107005. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.107005
  11. El-Naby A, Khalil AE, Talaat A, Ismail A. Gas channels and chimneys detection using post-stack seismic attributes, simian field, offshore west Nile Delta, Egypt. J Umm Al-Qura Univ Appl Sci. 2025;11(3):509-527. doi: 10.1007/s43994-024-00204-3
  12. Ismail A, Ewida HF, Al-Ibiary MG, Zollo A. Integrated prediction of deep-water gas channels using seismic coloured inversion and spectral decomposition attribute, West offshore, Nile Delta, Egypt. NRIAG J Astron Geophys. 2020;9(1):459-470. doi: 10.1080/20909977.2020.1768324
  13. Bashir Y, bin Waheed U, Ali SH, et al. Enhanced wave modeling & optimal plane-wave destruction (OPWD) method for diffraction separation and imaging. Comput Geosci. 2024;187:105576. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105576
  14. Bashir Y, Zahari MA, Karaman A, et al. Artificial intelligence and 3D subsurface interpretation for bright spot and channel detections. AIMS Geosci. 2024;10(4):662-683. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2024034
  15. Du LZ, Qiu JH, Zhang Q, et al. Gao baozhen gao fenbianlü yaoce dizhen kantan caiji xitong yanzhi ji yingyong [Development and application of a high-fidelity and high-resolution telemetry seismic data acquisition system]. Chin J Geophys. 2019;62(10):3964-3973. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0483
  16. Song CZ, Zhang XM. Dizhen ziliao gao fenbianlü chuli jishu yingyong [Seismic data high resolution processing technique and its application]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2009;44(S1):44-48. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2009.s1.024
  17. Shi WW, Huang RS, Wang DN, et al. Dizhen ziliao de gaobaozhen ronghe chuli jishu zai jidong youtian nanpu diqu de yingyong [Application of High-fidelity Merging Processing of Seismic Data at Nanpu Area in Jidong Oilfield]. Mar Orig Pet Geol. 2015;2:63-71. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2015.02.009
  18. Yun MH, Zhao QF, Li XB. Dizhen fenbianlü sikao yu gaofenbianlü kantan duice [Thought about seismic resolution and countermeasures of high-resolution seismic exploration]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2022;57(5):1250-1262. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2022.05.026
  19. Su GS, Shen KF, Ding XY, et al. Dizhen shuju chuli zhong guanyu dizhen zibo xiangwei texing de tantao [Discussion on phase character of seismic wavelet in seismic data processing]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2008;43(S2):121-124. [In Chinese].
  20. Gao SW, Zhou XY, Cai JM. Fanshebo dibiao yizhixing xiangwei jiaozheng [Surface-consistent phase correction for reflection wave]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2001;36(4):480-487.
  21. Zhao Y, Mao NB, Chen X. Jiyu shipinyu xinzaobi de zishiying zengyi xian fan Q lübo fangfa [Self-adaptive gain-limit inverse Q filtering method based on SNR in time-frequency domain]. Lithol Reserv. 2021;33(4):85-92. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210409
  22. Ricker N. Wavelet contraction, wavelet expansion, and the control of seismic resolution. Geophysics. 1953;18(4):769-792. doi: 10.1190/1.1437927
  23. Widess MB. Quantifying resolving power of seismic systems. Geophysics. 1982;47(8):1160-1173. doi: 10.1190/1.1441379
  24. Yun MH, Ding W. Dizhen fenbianli xin renshi [New knowledge about seismic identifying capability]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2005;40(5):603-608. [In Chinese].
  25. Puryear CI, Castagna JP. Layer-thickness determination and stratigraphic interpretation using spectral inversion: Theory and application. Geophysics. 2008;73(2):R37-R48. doi: 10.1190/1.2838274
  26. Chopra S, Castagna JP, Xu Y. Thin-bed reflectivity inversion and some applications. First Break. 2009;27(5). doi: 10.3997/1365-2397.2009009
  27. Tirado SK. Sand thickness estimation using spectral decomposition. Master's thesis. Norman, OK: The University of Oklahoma; 2004. Accessed June 10, 2026. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/323796
  28. Oyem A, Castagna J. Layer thickness estimation from the frequency spectrum of seismic reflection data. SEG Tech Program Exp Abstr. 2013;32:1451-1455. doi: 10.1190/segam2013-0691.1
  29. Liu WJ, Zhou H, Yuan SY, et al. Pu fanyan zai dizhen shuxing jieshi zhong de yingyong [Applications of spectral inversion in the attribute interpretation]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2013;48(3):423-428. [In Chinese].
  30. Puryear CI, Portniaguine ON, Cobos CM, Castagna JP. Constrained least-squares spectral analysis: Application to seismic data. Geophysics. 2012;77(5):V143-V167. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0210.1
  31. Li ZH, Zhang FQ. Jiyu dipin ruan yueshu - jizhuizong baoceng fanyan fangfa yanjiu [Research of a thin-bed inversion based on basic pursuit with the low-frequency soft constraint]. Prog Geophys. 2018;33(6):2403-2408. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.6038/pg2018BB0519
  32. Gao L, Yang QY. Dizhen shuxing jishu de xin jinzhan [New Progress of Seismic Attribute techniques]. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2004;43(S1):10-16. [In Chinese]. https://www.doc88.com/p-7939929441318.html
  33. Chen CJ, Feng SM, Mo AL, et al. 90° xiangyi jishu zai yanxing jieshi zhong de yingyong [Application of 90° phase data in lithologic interpretation]. Oil Geophys Prospect. 2012;47(1):95-99. [In Chinese].
  34. Castagna J, Oyem A, Portniaguine O, et al. Phase decomposition. Interpretation. 2016;4(3):SN1-SN10. doi: 10.1190/INT-2015-0150.1
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing